Journalism's first loyalty is to its audience. There is an 
implied agreement with the public that was is reported is true and in 
their interests. For example, The State News can't have a story on MSU 
that's slanted in favor of the school just because The State News is 
MSU's paper. And a story can't be slanted because the subject is a 
friend of the editor.
And that agreement is in the best financial
 interest of the news organization. That's because it's necessary to 
tell the news not only accurately, but persuasively. It's the basis of 
why the audience believes a news organization. If the audience doesn't 
trust a newspaper, they will quit reading the newspaper, and the 
newspaper would be unable to sell ads which are bought by advertisers not because they believe in journalism, but because the newspaper has lots of readers whom the advertiser would like to reach.
If
 you thought or think The State News is a shill for the administration, 
would you rely on it in the same way if yo thought it was independent? 
So, journalists have a social obligation to the news and audience, and 
must maintain a freedom from all obligations except that of the public 
interest.
We also must maintain an independence from isolation.
 There is a danger that having a professional detachment from outside 
pressures -- such as politicians and lobbyists -- could evolve into 
disengagement from the community.
Ironically, as 
journalism became more professional, it became more of a clique, with 
professionals lacking local connections and becoming free agents, 
hopping from town to town. Also, journalism became more subjective and 
judgmental after Watergate and the advent of 24-hour cable TV news. 
Coverage became increasingly focused on mediating and arguing instead of
 reporting and explaining. There was a growing focus on motives of 
public officials, instead of actions that affect readers. Plus, there 
are business strategies to target affluent households that advertisers 
most want to access, instead of the general public as a whole.
There
 has been a backlash to that detachment. People on the business end of 
journalism want greater accountability from reporters and editors. They 
want to use research to find out what the audience wants. They see 
themselves as fighting to keep journalism relevant.
But
 writers and editors fear that approach can intrude on independence. 
They fear that may allow advertisers, rather than news value, to dictate
 coverage. They see themselves as fighting to protect the public 
interest. This tension is still playing itself out, and the resolution 
seems unclear.
Citizens are not customers. The 
business relationship of journalism with its audience is different that 
other businesses with their customers.  Traditional businesses sell 
services and products to customers. Journalists build a relationship 
with their audience. That is not a nit-pick difference; the relationship
 is built upon values, judgment, authority, coverage, professionalism 
and commitment to the community. That creates a bond with the audience. 
Then, the news organization rents the bond to advertisers, via ads.
The
 advertiser is the one buying goods and services (in the form of 
advertising), and not the audience. The trust with the audience is what 
creates something the advertiser finds worthy of buying. Hence, the 
traditional "wall" between advertising and news content, and a deference
 to the newsroom to make journalistic decisions independently.
No comments:
Post a Comment